Management

  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: GOVERNING STATUTES

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    ALABAMA – Alabama Code Title 8.20

    ALASKA – AS45.25.010 to AS 45.25.990

    ARIZONA – ARS 28 Ch. 10 Art. 5 4451-4463

    ARKANSAS – Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission Act, Arkansas Code § 23-112.101-107 and 401-806

    CALIFORNIA – California Vehicle Code Section 11713-11740

    COLORADO – Colorado Powersports Vehicles, Colo. Rev. Stat. 12-6-501-33

    CONNECTICUT – Connecticut Gen. Stat. Title 42, Chap. 739, §42-133r to §42-133ee, Conn. Gen. Stat. Title 42, Chap. 743b, §42-179(d)

    DELAWARE – Title 6, Ch. 49

    FLORIDA – FS 320

    GEORGIA – Motor Vehicle Fair Practices Act, GC Title 10, Ch. 1.22

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Franchise Definition

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Dealer Agreement or Franchise: The written contract between any new motor vehicle manufacturer and any new motor vehicle dealer which purports to fix the legal rights and liabilities of the parties to such agreement or contract, and pursuant to which the dealer purchases and resells the franchise product or leases or rents the dealership premises.

    ALASKA – “Franchise” means a written arrangement for a definite or indefinite period in which a manufacturer, distributor, or motor vehicle wholesaler grants to a motor vehicle dealer a license, sales and service agreement, or contract of any kind to use a trade name, service mark, or related characteristic, and in which there is a community of interest in the wholesale or retail marketing of related motor vehicles or services. The terms and conditions in an agreement between a manufacturer and a new motor vehicle dealer in this state, including a motor vehicle franchise agreement, that are inconsistent with the law of this state do not have any force or effect in this state.

    ARIZONA – “Franchise” means a written arrangement for a definite or indefinite period in which a manufacturer, distributor, or motor vehicle wholesaler grants to a motor vehicle dealer a license, sales and service agreement, or contract of any kind to use a trade name, service mark, or related characteristic, and in which there is a community of interest in the wholesale or retail marketing of related motor vehicles or services. The terms and conditions in an agreement between a manufacturer and a new motor vehicle dealer in this state, including a motor vehicle franchise agreement, that are inconsistent with the law of this state do not have any force or effect in this state.

    ARKANSAS – “Franchise” means one or more contracts between a franchised dealer as franchisee and either a manufacturer or a distributor, importer, second-stage manufacturer, or converter as franchiser under which:

    • (A) The franchisee is granted the right to sell, service, or sell and service new motor vehicles manufactured or distributed by the franchiser;
    • (B) The franchisee as an independent business is a component of the franchiser’s distribution system;
    • (C) The franchise is substantially associated with the franchiser’s trademark, trade name, or commercial symbol;
    • (D) The franchisee’s business is substantially reliant on the franchiser for a continued supply of motor vehicles, parts, or accessories for the conduct of its business; or
    • (E) (i) Any right, duty, or obligation granted or imposed by this chapter is affected; (ii) “Franchise” includes a written communication from a franchiser to a franchisee by which a duty is imposed upon the franchisee.

    CALIFORNIA – A “franchise” is a written agreement between two or more persons having all of the following conditions:

    • (1) A commercial relationship of definite duration or continuing indefinite duration.
    • (2) The franchisee is granted the right to offer for sale or lease, or to sell or lease at retail new motor vehicles or new trailers subject to identification pursuant to Sec. 5014.1 manufactured or distributed by the franchisor or the right to perform authorized warranty repairs and service, or the right to perform any combination of these activities.
    • (3) The franchisee constitutes a component of the franchisor’s distribution system.
    • (4) The operation of the franchisee’s business is substantially associated with the franchisor’s trademark, trade name, advertising, or other commercial symbol designating the franchisor.
    • (5) The operation of a portion of the franchisee’s business is substantially reliant on the franchisor for a continued supply of new vehicles, parts, or accessories. Does not include standalone authorized service facilities.
    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Warranty Reimbursement

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – “The compensation that the manufacturer or distributor pays to the new motor vehicle dealer for parts used in warranty or recall related service shall be fair and reasonable and, at the option of the new motor vehicle dealer, may be determined pursuant to subsection E of this section…. A manufacturer or distributor may not recover all or any portion of its costs for compensating a dealer for warranty parts and service, including parts and service associated with vehicle recalls, either by reduction in the amount due the dealer or by separate charge, surcharge, administrative fee or other imposition.”

    ALASKA – Not specified

    ARIZONA – The new motor vehicle dealer’s retail labor rate “shall be determined by dividing the amount of the dealer’s total labor sales contained in the submitted repair orders by the total number of labor hours that generated those sales. The new motor vehicle dealer’s retail rate for parts shall be a percentage determined by dividing the total sales for parts in the submitted repair orders by the new motor vehicle dealer’s total cost for those parts, minus one, and then multiplied by [100] to produce a percentage. Declared rates are presumed to be fair and reasonable except that a manufacturer or distributor, within [30] days after receiving the new motor vehicle dealer’s submission, may rebut the presumption by reasonably substantiating that the rate or rates are inaccurate or unreasonable compared to other similarly situated same line-make new motor vehicle dealers in the state.

    ARKANSAS – Prevailing retail rates, compared to other dealers in the area (Act 1055)

    CALIFORNIA – In determining the adequacy and fairness of the compensation, the franchisee’s effective labor rate charged to its various retail customers may be considered together with other relevant criteria.

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Vehicle Allotments

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – A performance standard, sales objective, or program for measuring dealership performance that may have a material effect on a dealer, including the dealer’s right to payment under any incentive or reimbursement program, shall be fair, reasonable, equitable, and based on accurate information.

    ALASKA – Not specified

    ARIZONA – Provides for “fair, reasonable and equitable vehicle allocation.”

    ARKANSAS – Not specified

    CALIFORNIA – Not specified

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Terminations

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Good cause, six months’ notice and cure. Enumerated compensation requirements specifically exclude motorcycle dealers.

    ALASKA – Good cause, 60 days’ notice and cure.

    ARIZONA – Good cause, seven legal elements.

    ARKANSAS – Just cause, 11 legal elements.

    CALIFORNIA – Good cause, seven legal elements, compensation requirements.

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Relevant Market Area (RMA)

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – The area within a radius of 20 miles around an existing dealer or the area of responsibility defined in the franchise, whichever is greater; except that, where a manufacturer is seeking to establish an additional new motor vehicle dealer and there are one or more existing new motor vehicle dealers of the same line make within a 10-mile radius of the proposed dealer site, the relevant market area shall in all instances be the area within a radius of 10 miles around an existing dealer. OEM may not “assign or change a dealer’s area of responsibility under the franchise or dealer agreement arbitrarily or without due regard to the present or projected future pattern of motor vehicle sales and registrations within the dealer’s market area and without first having provided the dealer with written notice of the change in the dealer’s area of responsibility and a detailed description of the change and reasons therefor.”

    ALASKA – not specified

    ARIZONA – 10 miles “by the shortest street route,” 20 miles in counties with fewer than 200,000 residents. “Area of responsibility” means the area surrounding an individual dealer that the factory designates as that dealer’s individual primary geographic territory for the purpose of marketing, promoting, selling and leasing new motor vehicles. In the absence of the factory designated area, the area of responsibility is that geographical area surrounding a dealer that lies closer to that dealer than to other dealers of the same line-make.

    ARKANSAS – 10 mile radius; change of DAT requires 30 days’ notice.

    CALIFORNIA – Generally, the RMA “is any area within a radius of 10 miles from the site of a potential new dealership.” For purposes of allotments, “a geographic area specified in a franchise that is used by the franchisor for the purpose of evaluating the franchisee’s performance of its sales and service obligations.”

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Renovations

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Must be reasonable.

    ALASKA – Not specified

    ARIZONA – … “reasonable and justifiable in light of current and reasonably foreseeable economic conditions…or unless the alteration is reasonably required to effectively display and service a vehicle based on the technology of the vehicle.”

    ARKANSAS – Incentive penalties allowed for refusing renovation after seven years.

    CALIFORNIA – Manufacturer may not “require, by contract or otherwise, a dealer to make a material alteration, expansion, or addition to any dealership facility, unless the required alteration, expansion, or addition is reasonable in light of all existing circumstances, including economic conditions and advancements in vehicular technology.”

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Relocation

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Not specified

    ALASKA – A manufacturer may not require, coerce, or attempt to coerce a new motor vehicle dealer to change the location of the new motor vehicle dealership or to make any substantial alterations to the new motor vehicle dealership premises or facilities if the change or alteration would be unreasonable or if there is not a sufficient supply of new motor vehicles to justify the expansion in light of the current market and economic conditions.

    ARIZONA – Not allowed as a condition of business.

    ARKANSAS – Reasonable and justifiable in light of the current and reasonably foreseeable projections of economic conditions, financial expectations and the motor vehicle dealer’s market. In a denial of franchise relocation, the burden of proof is on the manufacturer or distributor to show it has good cause for granting the new franchise, except when an existing franchisee initiated the relocation.

    CALIFORNIA – Not specified

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: Purchasing Authority

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Not specified

    ALASKA – Not specified

    ARIZONA – A factory may require a dealer to purchase reasonable quantities of advertising materials, purchase reasonable quantities of special tools required to properly service a motor vehicle and undertake reasonable salesperson or service person training related to the motor vehicle as a condition of receiving a motor vehicle.

    ARKANSAS – Dealer may choose vendor of renovation materials.

    CALIFORNIA – “A required facility alteration, expansion, or addition shall not be deemed reasonable if it requires that the dealer purchase goods or services from a specific vendor when goods or services of substantially similar kind, quality, and general design concept are available from another vendor.” OEMs may require approval.

    Read more
    Comments (0)
  • FRANCHISE LAW ROUNDUP: OEM Files

    Monday, December 19, 2016 | Holly Wagner

    Please refer to Governing Statutes for more information. “Not specified” indicates that an issue is not addressed specifically in the particular statutes. Please send any updates to editors@dealernews.com

    ALABAMA – Manufacturer “must disclose upon written request therefor, the basis upon which new motor vehicles of the same line-make are allocated or distributed to motor vehicle dealers in the state and the basis upon which the current allocation or distribution is being made or will be made to such motor vehicle dealer.

    ALASKA – Not specified

    ARIZONA – Not specified

    ARKANSAS – Not specified

    CALIFORNIA – Not specified

    Read more
    Comments (0)